The Enterprise BaaS Requirements
Before comparing platforms, let's establish what enterprise applications actually need from a backend service.Non-Negotiable Requirements
- Authentication and Authorization
- Email/password authentication
- Social login (Google, GitHub, Apple)
- Enterprise SSO (SAML, OAuth)
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Row-level security (data access per user)
- Database
- Structured data storage
- Real-time subscriptions
- Complex queries (joins, aggregations)
- Full-text search
- Horizontal scalability
- File Storage
- Image uploads
- Document storage
- Video hosting
- CDN delivery
- Access control per file
- APIs
- Auto-generated REST APIs
- GraphQL support
- Serverless functions (custom business logic)
- Webhook integrations
- Real-Time Features
- Live data updates
- Presence (who's online)
- Collaborative features (multiplayer editing)
- Enterprise Concerns
- Data residency (EU, US, specific regions)
- Compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR)
- Self-hosting option (no vendor lock-in)
- Transparent pricing
- Migration path (exit strategy)
Firebase: The Google-Backed Incumbent
Firebase launched in 2011, acquired by Google in 2014, and became the dominant BaaS platform with 3M+ applications built on it.Core Strengths
- Mature, Battle-Tested Infrastructure
- Duolingo (500M+ users)
- Lyft (driver/rider matching)
- The New York Times (content delivery)
- Todoist (real-time sync)
- Comprehensive Feature Set
- Firestore (NoSQL database)
- Authentication (email, social, phone)
- Cloud Storage (files, images, videos)
- Cloud Functions (serverless compute)
- Hosting (static site hosting)
- Analytics (user behavior tracking)
- Crashlytics (error reporting)
- Performance Monitoring
- Remote Config (feature flags)
- A/B Testing
- Cloud Messaging (push notifications)
- ML Kit (on-device machine learning)
- Exceptional Mobile SDK
- FlutterFire: Official Flutter plugins
- Firebase SDK for iOS: Swift/Objective-C
- Firebase SDK for Android: Kotlin/Java
- React Native Firebase: Community-maintained
Firestore: The NoSQL Database
Firebase's primary database is Firestore (document-based NoSQL): Data structure:- collections/
- users/
- userId123/
- - email: "user@example.com"
- - name: "John Doe"
- - createdAt: timestamp
- posts/
- postId456/
- - title: "My Post"
- - authorId: "userId123"
- - content: "..."
- Automatic scaling (no manual sharding)
- Real-time listeners (data updates instantly)
- Offline support (local cache, sync when online)
- Simple queries (filter, sort, limit)
- No joins (must denormalize data or make multiple queries)
- Limited aggregations (no GROUP BY, SUM, AVG)
- Expensive for high read volumes (charged per document read)
- Query limitations (can't do OR queries across fields easily)
Pricing Structure
Firebase uses consumption-based pricing: Firestore costs:- Document reads: $0.06 per 100K
- Document writes: $0.18 per 100K
- Document deletes: $0.02 per 100K
- Storage: $0.18 per GB/month
- Reads: $6.00
- Writes: $3.60
- Storage (50GB): $9.00
- Total: $18.60/month
- Reads: $60
- Writes: $36
- Storage: $9
- Total: $105/month
- Reads: $600
- Writes: $360
- Storage: $9
- Total: $969/month
Where Firebase Struggles
- Vendor Lock-In
- Firestore data structure doesn't map to SQL
- Firebase Auth uses proprietary tokens
- Cloud Functions are Google-specific
- Switching costs: $50K to $200K for medium-sized app
- Limited Data Modeling
- Unpredictable Costs
- No Self-Hosting
- Data residency (must store data in specific country)
- Highly regulated industries (finance, healthcare)
- Companies with strict vendor policies
Supabase: The Open-Source PostgreSQL Alternative
Supabase launched in 2020 as an "open-source Firebase alternative" built on PostgreSQL instead of NoSQL.Core Philosophy
"Use proven, open-source tools instead of proprietary systems." Supabase isn't a custom database. It's a carefully integrated stack of existing tools:- PostgreSQL (database)
- PostgREST (auto-generated APIs)
- GoTrue (authentication)
- Realtime (real-time subscriptions via PostgreSQL)
- Storage (S3-compatible file storage)
PostgreSQL: The SQL Advantage
Supabase uses PostgreSQL, the world's most advanced open-source relational database. Data structure: sql -- Users table CREATE TABLE users ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, email TEXT UNIQUE, name TEXT, created_at TIMESTAMP ); -- Posts table with foreign key CREATE TABLE posts ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, title TEXT, content TEXT, author_id UUID REFERENCES users(id), created_at TIMESTAMP ); Advantages over NoSQL:- Complex queries are simple:
- Data integrity built-in:
- Foreign keys (can't delete user if they have posts)
- Constraints (email must be unique)
- Transactions (all-or-nothing operations)
- Aggregations are native:
Row-Level Security (RLS)
Supabase's killer feature: enforce data access rules at the database level. Example policy: sql -- Users can only read their own data CREATE POLICY "Users see own data" ON posts FOR SELECT USING (auth.uid() = author_id); Now when a user queries posts, PostgreSQL automatically filters to only their posts. No application code needed. Secure by default.Pricing Structure
Supabase offers transparent, predictable pricing: Free tier:- 500MB database storage
- 1GB file storage
- 50,000 monthly active users
- Unlimited API requests
- $0/month
- 8GB database storage
- 100GB file storage
- 100,000 monthly active users
- Daily backups
- Fixed cost regardless of requests
- Organizations with multiple projects
- Read replicas
- Priority support
- Dedicated infrastructure
- SLA guarantees
- Self-hosted option
| Platform | Cost |
| Firebase | $600-$1,000 (scales with reads) |
| Supabase | $25-$599 (fixed tier pricing) |
Real-Time Capabilities
Supabase Realtime allows subscribing to database changes: Example: javascript // Subscribe to new posts const subscription = supabase .from('posts') .on('INSERT', payload => { console.log('New post!', payload.new) }) .subscribe() How it works: PostgreSQL's built-in replication stream (logical replication) publishes changes. Supabase listens and broadcasts via WebSockets. Performance: Sub-100ms latency for real-time updates.Where Supabase Struggles
- Younger Platform
- PostgreSQL Scaling Complexity
- Mobile Offline Support
- Additional Services
Appwrite: The Self-Hosted Privacy Champion
Appwrite launched in 2019 as a completely self-hosted, privacy-first BaaS platform.Core Philosophy
"Your data stays on your infrastructure. Full control, zero vendor lock-in." Appwrite is designed to run on your servers (AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, on-premises).Architecture
Appwrite consists of:- MariaDB (relational database)
- Redis (caching, pub/sub)
- InfluxDB (time-series data)
- ClamAV (antivirus scanning for uploads)
- Docker containers (entire stack runs in containers)
Key Features
- Privacy by Design
- Healthcare (HIPAA compliance)
- Finance (PCI requirements)
- Government (data sovereignty)
- Privacy-focused companies
- Built-In Admin Console
- Users (create, delete, assign roles)
- Databases (create collections, add attributes)
- Storage (view uploaded files)
- Functions (deploy serverless functions)
- Settings (configure auth providers, webhooks)
- Multi-Tenancy Support
- Generous Free Tier (Self-Hosted)
- DigitalOcean droplet (4GB RAM): $24/month
- Block storage (100GB): $10/month
- Total: $34/month for unlimited usage
Where Appwrite Struggles
- Self-Hosting Overhead
- Server maintenance (updates, security patches)
- Backups (database, files)
- Monitoring (uptime, performance)
- Scaling (adding servers for growth)
- Smaller Ecosystem
- Limited Managed Offering
- Database Flexibility
Head-to-Head Comparison
Database Capabilities
| Feature | Firebase | Supabase | Appwrite |
| Database Type | NoSQL (Firestore) | SQL (PostgreSQL) | SQL (MariaDB) |
| Complex Queries | Limited | Excellent | Good |
| Joins | No | Yes | Yes |
| Aggregations | Limited | Native | Native |
| Full-Text Search | Limited | Built-in | Plugin required |
| Real-Time | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Offline Sync | Excellent | Basic | Basic |
Authentication
| Feature | Firebase | Supabase | Appwrite |
| Email/Password | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Social Login | 20+ providers | 10+ providers | 30+ providers |
| Enterprise SSO | (SAML) | (SAML) | Coming soon |
| Phone Auth | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Magic Links | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| MFA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Pricing (at 1M monthly active users, 10B database operations)
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Notes |
| Firebase | $8,000-$12,000 | Scales with usage |
| Supabase | $599 (Team tier) | Fixed pricing |
| Appwrite | $200-$500 | Self-hosted infrastructure only |
Vendor Lock-In Risk
| Platform | Lock-In Level | Migration Path |
| Firebase | High | Expensive ($50K-$200K) |
| Supabase | None | Standard PostgreSQL |
| Appwrite | None | Standard MariaDB |
Developer Experience
| Aspect | Firebase | Supabase | Appwrite |
| Documentation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| SDKs | 10+ languages | 8+ languages | 12+ languages |
| Learning Curve | Medium | Low (if you know SQL) | Medium |
| Community Size | Very Large | Large | Growing |
Real-World Implementation Results
Case Study 1: Healthcare SaaS (Supabase)
Client: Patient management system for 200+ clinics Requirements:- HIPAA compliance (data must stay in US)
- Complex queries (patient records, appointments, billing)
- Real-time updates (appointment scheduling)
- Budget-conscious ($500/month max for backend)
- PostgreSQL handles complex medical data relationships
- Self-hosting option provides HIPAA compliance
- Row-level security ensures patients only see their own data
- Fixed pricing stays within budget
- 50,000 active users
- 500M database operations/month
- Monthly cost: $599 (Team tier)
- Zero HIPAA violations
- 99.97% uptime
Case Study 2: Consumer Mobile App (Firebase)
Client: Social networking app for pet owners Requirements:- Mobile-first (iOS and Android)
- Real-time chat between users
- Image sharing
- Push notifications
- Analytics (user behavior tracking)
- Best mobile SDKs (Flutter, iOS, Android)
- Firestore's real-time listeners perfect for chat
- Cloud Messaging for push notifications
- Firebase Analytics included
- Crashlytics for error tracking
- 300,000 active users
- 2.5B monthly operations
- Monthly cost: $1,800
- 4.8-star app rating (performance and reliability)
- 99.9% uptime
Case Study 3: Internal Enterprise Tool (Appwrite)
Client: Project management system for 5,000-employee company Requirements:- Data must stay on company infrastructure (security policy)
- Integration with existing Active Directory
- Custom branding
- No ongoing SaaS fees (one-time budget approved)
- Self-hosted on company AWS account
- Full control over data and infrastructure
- One-time implementation cost ($45K) vs ongoing SaaS fees
- Customizable for company branding
- 5,000 users
- 50M monthly operations
- Monthly cost: $420 (AWS infrastructure only)
- Company security audit passed
- Integrated with existing tools
Decision Framework
Choose Firebase If:
You're building a mobile-first application You need comprehensive analytics and crash reporting Real-time collaboration is critical (chat, multiplayer games) You want everything in one platform (auth, database, storage, functions, hosting) You can accept vendor lock-in for convenience Your data model is simple (doesn't require complex SQL joins) Ideal for: Consumer mobile apps, real-time collaboration tools, prototypes needing fast iterationChoose Supabase If:
Your data is relational (users, orders, products with relationships) You need complex queries (joins, aggregations, filtering) You want to avoid vendor lock-in (PostgreSQL is standard) Predictable costs matter (fixed tier pricing) You might need self-hosting later (but want managed now) You know SQL or want to learn a transferable skill Ideal for: SaaS applications, B2B tools, eCommerce, data-heavy applications, startups planning for scaleChoose Appwrite If:
Data privacy/sovereignty is non-negotiable You have DevOps capability (or budget for it) You want zero recurring vendor fees You need to pass security audits (healthcare, finance, government) You're building internal tools (not public-facing) Multi-tenancy in single instance matters (many projects) Ideal for: Enterprise internal tools, regulated industries, privacy-focused startups, agencies building client apps Migration ConsiderationsFirebase to Supabase
Complexity: High Timeline: 8-16 weeks for medium app Steps:- Export Firestore data (collections to JSON)
- Design PostgreSQL schema (normalize data)
- Migrate authentication (export users, import to Supabase)
- Rewrite queries (NoSQL to SQL)
- Update client SDKs
- Test thoroughly
- Cutover
Supabase to Self-Hosted
Complexity: Low Timeline: 2-4 weeks Steps:- Set up PostgreSQL server
- Dump Supabase database
- Restore to your server
- Configure Supabase components (or use Supabase self-hosted)
- Update connection strings
- Test
Supabase vs Firebase vs Appwrite: The 2026 Guide for Enterprise BaaS Selection
Backend development has historically consumed 60-70% of application development time and cost. Every app needs...
Share this link via
Or copy link